Replacing Trimmed Fat with Back Fat

Post Reply
Rick
Passionate
Passionate
Posts: 274
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 00:09
Location: Rockford, MI

Replacing Trimmed Fat with Back Fat

Post by Rick » Fri Dec 20, 2013 19:10

Lately, when I get a pork butt for sausage, I trim out as much of that soft fat and membrane as I can when I'm cutting it into chunks. I'll weigh the fat pile and replace that amount with back fat.

What's your feeling on this practice, is it worth the trouble? Does anyone else do this?
Cabonaia
Forum Enthusiast
Forum Enthusiast
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 02:07
Location: Morgan Hill, CA

Post by Cabonaia » Fri Dec 20, 2013 21:01

I think it's a good idea depending on what you are making and what the fat is like in the meat you're using. I don't bother and am happy with results.
User avatar
redzed
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3853
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 06:29
Location: Vancouver Island

Post by redzed » Sat Dec 21, 2013 00:28

Unless you are making certain dry cured products, you are wasting good fat and time. Some sausages actually call the softer fats.
User avatar
sawhorseray
Veteran
Veteran
Posts: 1110
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2012 20:25
Location: Elk Grove, CA

Post by sawhorseray » Sat Dec 21, 2013 01:35

I agree. A normal porkbutt will be just about perfect for most any sausage you might be making. If you're making sausage from wild game such as deer, elk, or even wild boar, then you'd need to be adding some backfat. When I go wild hog hunting I pretty much try go after a fat young sow, that way I just cut my sausage with about 35-40% straight porkbutt and it's fine. I won't even pull the trigger on a boar anymore, not for over a decade now. RAY
“Good judgment comes from experience, and a lotta that comes from bad judgment.”
Post Reply